As seen in Malaysia, Astro is one of the pay TV operator with the given license for 20 years. This situation is different from the other countries with has different operators which are offering with different types or rates. By comparing India with Malaysia, there are tv operators in India offering up to 155 channels at the price RM9.17 whereas in Malaysia, Astro is only offering 3 mini packages which include 55 channels at the price RM 64.61. However, Astro subscribers have to pay last payment charges, reinstallation charges and servicing charges. Other than that, Astro repackaged and increase the price every 2 years.
What is monopoly?
Monopoly is a market structure which a single firm produces a particular goods
and service. There are few types of barriers to entry such as
patents/copyright, economies of scale, large initial investment, government
directive and ownership of scarce raw materials. Based on this article, Astro
monopolize the market of pay TV operator in Malaysia. Astro is the price maker
and there are no competitors. This gives a disadvantage to the customers where
they are not allowed to change to another firm because there are no close
substitutes in Malaysia besides Astro. It is used to have competitors but due
to the poor services that the other firms provide, they are forced to shut down
the company. Besides that, Astro keeps potential rivals by setting barriers to
entry where Astro has a license from the government which are strictly prevent
other firms from entering the industry.
What will happen is
Astro continues to monopolize the market? If Astro continues monopolized the market,
there are going to be lesser and lesser viewers. This is because they have the
ability to raise its price without losing the demand of its product. Moreover,
customers have a lower income rate could not afford the price of TV packages
which are set by Astro. With that, Astro will make a lesser profit compared to
the previous year. However, the government should open up the market and give
more licenses to other operators so that there will be healthy competition. By
doing this, there will be benefits for the consumers as they will have more
options. Thus, consumers are able to subscribe to different operators which
provide different types of programs. Unlike phone companies where they are oligopoly
competition, the customers will be able to switch to another company once they are
not satisfied with the current one. To wrap up, there should more pay TV
operators so that there will be a good economy of the country and more job
opportunities for the people.
Reference of article: http://www.consumer.org.my/index.php/development/private-sector/479-astros-monopoly-has-short-changed-malaysian-tv-viewers
Prepared by: Lim Kye Lyn
Student ID: 0311892
No comments:
Post a Comment